DISH Network Deals
See Important Tip On The 'DISH Network Deals' Page Before Ordering Online

Posts tagged ‘Commercials’

Nobody is surprised that the big broadcast networks are starting to voice their displeasure with DISH’s new “Auto Hop” feature which allows Hopper DVR users to skip most commercials when they watch programming recorded from the big four broadcast networks.

CBS honcho Les Moonves sounds a bit baffled by DISH’s decision to introduce a feature that will eliminate commercials. “They can’t just take our signal and change it and put on a black spot where our commercials were,” he said.

Concerned about generating the revenue they normally receive from commercials, Moonves also wonders how DISH Chairman Charlie Ergen expects him to produce CSI without ads.

DISH CEO Joe Clayton has responded to the concerns that network execs have about “Auto Hop.” Clayton says DISH has “respect for the networks and for the advertising model.” This may not play well with network bosses, but Clayton does have a point.

Considering that DISH Network has been running some pretty wide-reaching advertising campaigns lately, the company is obviously walking the walk and not just talking the talk. There’s little doubt that DISH commercials are being zapped by the Hopper just like any other commercial.

Clayton points out that DISH has been spending more on nation-wide advertising during 2012 than the company has ever done. It’s a pretty good response to complaints from networks, but whether or not it eases their concerns remains to be seen.

DISH’s Vivek Khemka, president of product management says that they were not thinking much about how network executives would react to the introduction of the “Auto Hop” functionality and were more focused on what consumers wanted. Khemka goes on to indicate that customer response appears to be positive judging by the response the company is seeing in online comments and on sites like Facebook.

If I may interject my own thoughts (when have I ever failed to do so before?) on this issue, I’m with Vivek Khemka. Consumers like myself are sick and tired of commercials. Perhaps it’s because I’m old enough to remember when there was a lot less commercial content on television.

These days it seems that there is nearly as much commercial content during the airing of a TV program than there is actual program content.

Since FOX is one of the networks that is speaking out against “Auto Hop,” I’d like to talk a little bit about last night’s airing of American Idol. The number of commercials aired was off the scale. It was literally a single performance from one of the contestants then a series of commercials, another performance and another commercial break. Rinse and repeat.

There are usually occasions when they allow two performances before they break for commercials but that’s definitely the exception and not the rule.

And what makes matters worse is that it’s the same commercials over and over again. How many times do they think viewers want to see the same commercials? It’s gotten to the point where my wife actually gets up off the couch and goes and spends a few minutes doing something else during commercial breaks that air on American Idol. And she’s the one that usually gets annoyed when I complain about commercials!

I know I’ve said it before but commercial advertisers could do themselves a favor simply by making their commercials more unique, informative and interesting. I’ve had it with bumbling dads making idiots of themselves, talentless furniture store owners doing their own commercials and bratty teenagers with smart phones.

If you want me to watch your commercials, make them better. It’s that simple. Lord knows, big car companies, cell phone companies and food manufacturers have the budget to invest in better advertising. How about it advertisers? Or perhaps you think that the public is too stupid to appreciate more informative and interesting commercials.

Or perhaps I should say Xfinity? The cable giant seems to be moving towards changing their name from Comcast to Xfinity, so I guess we can expect to see more of that cool “X” name soon.

Anyway, the latest round of Comcast commercials almost had me rolling on the floor laughing. The ad shows two piles of televisions stacked up; one pile on the right and one pile on the left. The pile on the right is dramatically bigger than the pile on the left.

The ad then goes on to say that the pile on the right represents the number of HD “choices” offered by Comcast, while the pile on the left represents the number offered by satellite TV providers.

Although the ad does not come right out and say “channels,” that is the word that Comcast is probably hoping pops into the minds of those watching that particular commercial.

By “choices,” Comcast has to be including their library of on-demand programming into the equation. Yes, cable has always had more on-demand programming than satellite due to the nature of the way each service is distributed, and I don’t think anyone disputes that. However, I’m far more accustomed to hearing the various pay-TV services comparing their number of HD channels to the competition, which is something Comcast is reluctant to do since that reveals too much of the truth.

Does each on-demand program available in HD format equal an HD channel? I don’t think so, but that would certainly explain the dramatic difference between what Comcast says the satellite companies are offering and what they claims to be offering. How about pouring a little truth into the mix?

I’ve just finished checking the HD channels that Comcast offers in my area. I did not count HBO, Showtime or any of the other premium movie channels. The number if HD channels available from Comcast in my area is a whopping 36.

After that, I checked my DISH Network programming guide to see how many HD channels I could find. Again, not counting any premium movie channels, I counted a total of 64 HD channels on DISH Network. I excluded a number of HD sports channels that I presume are also premium channels, so if anything, the number I came up with for HD channels on DISH is conservative.

To take things to an even more ridiculous level, the new ads claim that Comcast’s HD picture quality is superior to satellite. My experience suggests otherwise. I have relatives that had Comcast cable (before they switched to Verizon FiOS recently) and comparing my DISH Network HD picture quality to theirs left no doubt that Comcast’s picture quality was inferior. My relatives even have a much newer and more expensive HD television set than I do!

Sorry, Comcast, or Xfinity, or whatever you are calling yourself, “choices” does not equal “channels,” and at least where I live, both satellite providers beat you hands down when one takes the time to actually count the number of HD channels from each provider. And from what I can see, as far as picture quality goes, that has not changed in the dozen or so years since I was a cable TV subscriber myself. Satellite delivered a better quality picture then, and still does today.

DirecTV Suing DISH Network


February 14th, 2010

This is one of those stories that makes you say: “Huh?”

It’s being reported that DirecTV, the largest satellite TV provider in the country, is suing DISH Network for “false advertising.”

It’s all due to some commercial advertisements that DISH Network has been using that claim they are offering the same programming that DirecTV does for $24 less per month. At least that’s what the suit claims. The DISH ads feature a slogan that asks, “Why pay more?”

I’m a little surprised by this news, since I constantly see competing advertisements on TV for various products and services that tell completely different stories. An excellent example would be the latest Verizon Wireless vs.. AT&T commercials.

If I am not mistaken, Verizon started the battle by featuring a map of their wireless coverage compared to AT&T’s, which, if the Verizon ads were to be believed, looked pretty pathetic compared to how they depicted their own network.

It didn’t take AT&T too long to fire back, claiming that their wireless network was much better than Verizon was claiming, and if course, while they were at it, they declared that AT&T’s wireless network was better.

Well, obviously someone is not telling the truth. These two companies are tearing each other up with claims that are completely contradictory, yet I am not hearing any reports of AT&T suing Verizon or vice versa.

As far back as I can remember, competing companies have used advertising that oftentimes shed a rather unflattering light on on another, but I don’t think they spent a lot of time suing each other. It seemed that was just the way the advertising game was played.

It will be interesting to see how this one plays out.

Copyright © SatelliteConsumer.com. All rights reserved.